Вернуться к статье

IPM-ПОДХОД С БИОГЕННЫМИ СТИМУЛЯТОРАМИ И БИОУДОБРЕНИЯМИ ДЛЯ БОБОВО-ЗЛАКОВЫХ СМЕСЕЙ: ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ ДОЛГОСРОЧНОЙ РЕЗИСТЕНТНОСТИ К СТРЕССОРАМ ВМЕСТО КРАТКОСРОЧНЫХ УРОЖАЙНЫХ ПИКОВ В КАЛИНИНГРАДСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ

Protection and nutrition systems (Factor A)

the conditional pesticide load was calculated as the sum, over all applied products, of the product of each preparation's application rate by its relative hazard coefficient, expressed as a percentage of the full chemical standard (A2 = 100 %); the control and full-biological treatments received no synthetic pesticides (0 %); treatments A4–A6 used a single reduced-rate fungicide treatment plus a reduced-rate herbicide, yielding a load of 35 % of the standard; the reported overall reduction of 58–68 % refers to the season-cumulative load relative to A2 across the experimental years and accounts for the omission of repeated chemical fungicide and insecticide applications used in A2; the per-treatment value of 35 % and the cumulative reduction of 58–68 % are therefore mutually consistent

Treatment

System

Conditional pesticide load, units*

A1

Control (N30P60K60 + rhizotorfin)

0

A2

Full chemical (Deposit ME + Gellert KE + Borey Neo + herbicide)

100

A3

Full biological (Fitosporin AS + Gumi-20 + BioLipoStim)

0

A4

Basic IPM (Deposit ME + Fitosporin AS during vegetation)

35

A5

IPM + biostimulant + chelates (A4 + Biostim Maslichny + Ultramag Combi + BionexChemi)

35

A6

IPM + full complex (A5 + Biopolimix + Borogum Extra)

35